RAGFlow vs Dify, which one should you choose for commercialization scenarios?

With the rapid implementation of large model (LLM) technology in various industries, the demand for conversational AI continues to heat up. More and more teams are beginning to explore how to better integrate intelligent conversations with business scenarios to improve customer experience and optimize internal enterprise processes. Among many solutions, RAGFlow  and  dify  have attracted much attention due to their unique technical ideas and application positioning. This article will analyze their characteristics, application scenarios, and applicable populations to help you better understand the differences between the two and make the best technology selection.

1. From “retrieval + generation” to “low-code dialogue platform” 

1. RAGFlow: Process

• Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Flow uses the technical idea of ​​Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): before the model generates an answer, it first searches the knowledge base or document, combines the retrieved relevant information with the conversation context, and then inputs it into the large model to answer. This method can significantly improve the accuracy and contextual consistency of the answer.
  

• Process orchestration is different from the common "directly calling a large model". RAGFlow provides the ability to modularly orchestrate the dialogue process. Developers can combine multiple steps such as data cleaning, retrieval, model calling, and result reprocessing into a process according to business needs, and perform fine-grained control over each link.
  

• High adaptability to scenarios Due to the flexible configuration of search modules and data sources, RAGFlow has good adaptability to internal knowledge Q&A, intelligent customer service, and multimodal information processing in complex scenarios. It is also very friendly to scenarios that require security filtering and permission control in the pre-conversation stage.
  

2. Dify: Conversational AI for low-code platforms

• One-stop development experience Dify focuses on the low-code/zero-code concept, providing developers with a visual interface and rich built-in functions, making it easier to build conversational AI. From the front end to the back end to data management, Dify strives to integrate all links on one platform.
  

• Fast MVP launch For startups or small and medium-sized enterprises, time and manpower are often limited. Dify's "out-of-the-box" feature allows developers to complete an MVP (minimum viable product) with very little coding and quickly iterate based on test feedback.
  

• Dify generally supports mainstream large language models (such as the GPT series, Claude, etc.), and also provides a certain degree of pluggable mechanism, allowing teams to choose or switch models according to their own needs. This flexibility is particularly critical in the early stages of business development.
  

2. Comparison of core functions and usage scenarios 

1. Application focus of RAGFlow

• Internal document Q&A in enterprises Because RAGFlow introduces a retrieval mechanism, it can accurately locate relevant information in enterprise documents or databases before answering, ensuring the correctness and consistency of the content. It is suitable for scenarios where strict control of answers is required, such as in the fields of law, finance, and medicine.
  

• The process framework of multimodal data fusion RAGFlow allows multimodal processing nodes such as image recognition and speech transcription to be embedded in the conversation process. In some complex applications that need to process text, speech, and images at the same time, RAGFlow can configure data flows more flexibly.
  

• Security Compliance and Permission Management When enterprises have high requirements for the security of conversation content, or need to set access rights for different departments and users, RAGFlow provides configurable filters and access control mechanisms to support compliance and auditing.
  

2. Dify’s application focus

• Customer Service and MarketingDify 's low threshold and visual features allow it to be quickly implemented in customer service, sales, and marketing scenarios. Through drag-and-drop configuration and simple logic settings, you can build a preliminary usable intelligent customer service or marketing robot to reduce labor costs.
  

• Content creation and copywriting generation Dify integrates a variety of large models, which is suitable for generating a large amount of text content in a short period of time, such as product descriptions, marketing copywriting, news summaries, etc. For small and medium-sized teams in the e-commerce and media industries, it can effectively improve production efficiency.
  

• Internal and external communication for small teams Since Dify comes with plug-ins such as user management and statistical analysis, small and medium-sized enterprises or start-up teams can directly develop, deploy and analyze dialogue systems within Dify without spending too many resources to connect to other systems.
  

3. Advantages and Disadvantages 

RAGFlow

• Advantages

1. Accuracy : The retrieval + generation mode can significantly improve the accuracy of the answers.
2. Customizable : Modular process orchestration can meet diverse business needs.
3. Security : Security auditing, permission filtering and other links can be inserted to protect sensitive information.

• insufficient

1. Getting started : It requires high technical strength of the team and certain experience in retrieval system and model configuration.
2. Deployment complexity : It is necessary to manage the index library, database, and linkage of various modules, which leads to higher deployment and maintenance costs.

Dify

• Advantages

1. Ease of use : Low/zero-code platform, developers can quickly build and launch MVP.
2. Multi-model support : flexibly switch between mainstream large models to adapt to different application requirements.
3. Rich plug-ins : It comes with visual analysis, user management and other functions to solve common needs in one stop.

• insufficient

1. Limited customization capabilities : It is difficult to deeply transform the internal logic, and support for large or complex business scenarios may be insufficient.
2. Accuracy controllability : Compared with RAGFlow's search-enhanced generation, Dify's answer accuracy in specific professional fields is slightly insufficient.

---

4. How to choose between the two? 

1. Business complexity and scale

• If your scenario requires highly controllable retrieval, streamlined multimodal processing, and high requirements for answer accuracy and security, RAGFlow  is better.
• If your needs are relatively simple and you want to quickly launch conversational robots, copywriting generation tools, etc., Dify  can help you achieve it quickly.

• Team technical capabilities

• Teams with experience in retrieval systems, large model deployment, and DevOps can easily master RAGFlow and leverage its high customizability.
• Teams with limited technical resources can choose Dify to quickly build prototypes or small and medium-sized projects on a visual platform.

• Long-term operation vs. quick verification

• RAGFlow is more suitable for using conversational AI as a core productivity tool, deeply integrating it into the internal enterprise system for long-term operation and maintenance.
• Dify is very suitable for product verification in a short cycle or projects with high requirements for iteration speed.

• Budget and resource investment

• RAGFlow requires more resources for database, retrieval system and subsequent maintenance, but it can provide strong performance and scalability in complex scenarios.
• Dify requires little initial investment, and the results can be seen in a short period of time. It also has a rich plug-in system to support it in the future.

---

V. Conclusion 

RAGFlow and Dify represent two development paths of conversational AI: the former excels in retrieval enhancement, controllability, and security , and is suitable for enterprise-level applications that require high accuracy and flexibility; the latter features low code, rapid iteration, and ease of use, and is aimed at small and medium-sized teams and start-up projects that have a higher pursuit of efficiency.

When making a choice, it is recommended to conduct a comprehensive assessment based on the company's own business scale, technical reserves, and expectations for future development. No matter which one you choose, you can gain significant efficiency improvements and user experience optimization in the field of conversational AI.

If you have more questions about RAGFlow or Dify, please leave a message in the comment area and discuss together!

{
  "target" : "Get to know me briefly" ,
  "selfInfo" : {
       "genInfo" : "Interviewer for a large company, studying for a master's degree in artificial intelligence at the Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, engaged in data closed-loop business, RAG, Agent, etc., and plays a comprehensive role in technology + platform. Good at research, summarization and planning, good at coordination and collaboration, likes technology, and likes to read articles and papers on new technologies and products" ,
       "contactInfo" : "abc061200x, v-adding disabled" ,
       "slogan" : "Simple, efficient, do the right thing" ,
       "extInfo" : "I like watching movies, traveling, outdoor hiking, reading and studying. I don't smoke or drink, and I don't have any bad habits."
  } 
}