Unveiling Manus: Understanding the principles and architecture behind it

Explore the innovative architecture and workflow of the cloud robot Manus.
Core content:
1. Manus's "brain, hands, workbench" architecture design
2. Simulate the workflow of human interns
3. Core technology highlights: Direct output of "hands and brains"
1. The overall architecture of Manus
The architecture of Manus can be likened to " a thinking cloud robot " . It consists of three parts: the brain (model layer) , hands (tool layer) and the workbench (execution environment) :
1. Brain ( Model Layer )
- Function : Responsible for understanding user instructions, planning task steps, and monitoring the execution process.
- Technical implementation :
- (1) Based on the collaborative work of multiple large models (such as Claude 3.5 and Qwen ), the division of labor between models is clear:
- Planning model : break down tasks (e.g. breaking down “writing a travel guide” into checking air tickets, choosing a hotel, and arranging an itinerary);
- Execution model : calling tools (such as browser search, writing code, generating documents);
- Audit model : Verify the results (e.g. check whether the hotel price is reasonable).
- (2) Dynamic learning : Adjust the execution strategy based on user feedback (for example, if users often choose economy hotels, subsequent recommendations will prioritize cost-effectiveness).
2. Hands ( Tool Layer )
- Functionality : Provides the tools needed to perform tasks, such as browsers, code editors, and file managers.
- Technical implementation :
- (1) Built-in tool chain : integrated Python interpreter , web crawler , and Office interface , which can directly operate files and data;
- (2) Private API access : for example, calling the flight query interface to obtain real-time ticket prices, or connecting to the company's internal database to extract customer information.
3. Workbench ( execution environment )
- Function : Provides a secure cloud environment to isolate different tasks to avoid interference.
- Technical implementation :
- (1) Virtual machine isolation : Each task runs in an independent cloud virtual machine to prevent data leakage; (2) Permission control : Dynamically assign permissions based on task requirements (such as only allowing reading of specified folders).
2. Working Principle of Manus
Manus's workflow is similar to that of a " human intern " , and is divided into four stages: understanding the task → breaking down the steps → performing the operation → providing feedback on the results :
1. Understand the task
- Example : User input: "Help me filter out 10 resumes suitable for algorithm engineers."
- principle :
- Model analysis keywords (“algorithm engineer”) to identify implicit requirements (such as programming skills and project experience);
- Confirm details through contextual understanding (such as whether fresh graduates need to be excluded).
2. Disassembly steps
- Case : The task is broken down into: unzip the file → read each file one by one → extract skill keywords → score and sort.
- principle :
- Agent Base system : decomposes the task into a subtask tree, each of which is handled by a different model or tool;
- MCP protocol : coordinates dependencies between subtasks (e.g., a file must be decompressed before a resume can be read).
3. Perform an action
- Case : Automatically call a Python script to decompress files and use a browser plug-in to crawl LinkedIn information.
- principle :
- Tool call : Model generation code
unzip resumes.zip
And execute, if an error occurs, a retry is triggered; - Asynchronous execution : The task runs independently in the cloud. The user can close the page and receive an email notification upon completion.
4. Feedback results
- Example : Generate an Excel table containing candidate rankings, skill matching, and reasons for recommendation.
- principle :
- Multimodal output : combining text, graphics, links (such as GitHub projects);
- Audit mechanism : The audit model checks for logical errors (such as misjudging “3 years of experience” as “5 years”).
3. Core technical highlights of Manus
1. Design with both hands and brain
- Traditional AI : Can only generate recommendations (such as “You should screen resumes for people with Python experience”).
- Manus : Directly output results (such as a resume form with a score), which is equivalent to the combination of "thinking + doing" .
2. Dynamic learning ability
- Case : After the user modifies the color scheme of the generated PPT several times, Manus automatically remembers the preference and uses the dark blue theme by default.
- Principle : Optimize the model through the AHPU indicator (the number of hours a user uses the Agent) instead of simply increasing the number of users.
3. Balance between safety and efficiency
- Virtual machine isolation : Even if a task fails (such as the crawler's IP is blocked), it will not affect other tasks;
- Cost control : A single task costs about US$2, which is only 1/5 of the same task of GPT-4.
4. The essential difference from ordinary large models
Comparison Items | Manus | Ordinary large models (such as GPT-4) |
Scope of Tasks | End-to-end closed loop (from instructions to deliverables) | Only provide suggestions or code snippets |
Execution Environment | Cloud virtual machine (with built-in browser and editor) | Depends on the user's local environment |
Interactive Mode | Asynchronous execution (can wait offline) | Synchronous interaction (must stay online) |
Learning Method | Dynamically adapt to user habits (such as preferences, commonly used tools) | Static output (cannot remember user history) |
5. Typical application scenarios
1. Resume screening
- Process : Upload compressed package → automatically decompress → extract skill keywords → generate ranking table → recommend interview questions .
- Advantages : HR saves 80% of time and avoids manual screening and missed talents.
2. Travel Planning
- Process : Input "Cherry Blossom Viewing in Japan in April + Budget 10,000" → Automatically check air tickets and hotels → Generate itinerary PDF → Booking link summary .
- Advantages : Users do not need to switch between multiple apps to compare prices.
VI. Controversies and Limitations
- Low technical transparency : No technical documentation is made public, and the project is suspected of relying on existing models (such as Claude) rather than originality.
- Task complexity limitation : It cannot handle tasks that require deep cross-platform interaction (such as automatically installing Steam games).
- Risk of over-marketing : Some demonstration videos may be edited and optimized, resulting in a gap in actual effect.