A Must-Know for AI Agent Engineers: API Gateway vs. API Management

Written by
Iris Vance
Updated on:June-09th-2025
Recommendation

A must-read guide for AI Agent engineers, in-depth analysis of the differences and collaboration between API gateways and API management. Core content: 1. The origin and development of API gateways and API management 2. Evolution and functions of gateways under different software architectures 3. New challenges and trends in gateways in cloud native and AI scenarios

 
Yang Fangxian
53A founder/Tencent Cloud (TVP), most valuable expert


"API Management" and "API Gateway" are often used alternately, even more important in large-model applications (large models are considered as catalysts for API economy/monetization). But in reality, they represent different concepts, serving different stages of the API life cycle. This article will explore the origin and development of the two, the comparison of key differences, how to work together, and future development trends. I hope this article will be of some help to the implementation of the engineering team in AI Agent.


origin and development




Cloud Native


The Evolution of API Gateway


API gateways have different forms as the software architecture evolves.


The evolution of software architecture is a process that continuously adapts to technological development and changes in business needs, and has gone through a monolithic architecture, vertical architecture, SOA architecture, microservice architecture, and cloud-native architecture. With the popularity of large language model, it has begun to evolve to AI native architecture.


1. Traffic Gateway



2. Microservices Gateway


Since 2014, as many Internet companies split the monolithic architecture into hundreds of microservices, the complexity of inter-service communication has increased exponentially. At the same time, with the accelerated development of the Internet economy, access traffic has increased sharply. Nginx is already difficult to host traffic management under the microservice architecture, Engineers urgently need a more functional gateway to solve the following problems:


  • Train Routing : Forward traffic to backend services (such as microservices, third-party APIs, etc.) based on the request path or parameters.
  • Protocol conversion : The protocol required to convert the client requested (such as HTTP/REST) ​​into the backend service (such as Dubbo, gRPC, etc.).
  • Basic security capabilities : Provides authentication (such as API keys, JWT), rate limiting, firewall and other functions to prevent malicious attacks.
  • Performance optimization : Supports caching, load balancing and request fuses to improve system stability and response speed.


The earliest open source implementations such as Zuul, Spring Cloud Gateway, etc. to achieve load balancing, current limit, fuse, authentication and other functions, and manage and optimize interactions between various microservices through unified entrance management. This not only simplifies the complexity of communication between clients and microservices, but also provides additional protection for system security.


3. Cloud native gateway


Cloud native gateway is an innovative gateway born with the widespread application of K8s. The natural isolation feature of K8s networks inside and outside the cluster requires that external requests be forwarded to internal services through the gateway. K8s uses the Ingress/Gateway API to unify the gateway configuration method, and also provides elastic scaling to help users solve application capacity scheduling problems.


Based on this, users have a new demand for the gateway: they are expected to have the characteristics of traffic gateways to handle massive requests, and also have the characteristics of microservice gateways to perform service discovery and service governance. At the same time, the gateway also has the ability to elastically expand and scale capacity to solve capacity scheduling problems. Therefore, the unified multi-layer gateway architecture is a trend. For example, Envoy and Higress are typical open source cloud native gateways that unify north-south and east-west traffic management.


4. AI Gateway


Superior capabilities have been expanded to meet the new requirements of AI scenarios, including traffic management for large models and MCP Servers, with long connections, large bandwidth and high latency features, providing:


  • Estimated with large models: flexible switching and bottom-up retry, large model content security and compliance, semantic caching, multi-API Key balance, Token quota management and flow limit, large model traffic grayscale, call cost auditing and other capabilities.
  • For MCP Server: supports API-to-MCP rapid conversion, and provides MCP Server proxy, security authentication, as well as unified observation, current limiting and other governance capabilities.


For example, Higress has evolved its capabilities specifically for AI scenarios based on cloud-native gateways.


The Evolution of API Gateway


 


1. Documentation stage: coming from interface documents


Typical period : 2005-2010 (taking the rise of REST as the watershed)
Representative Tools : Word Documents, Wikis, Interface Manuals, Early Swagger


The earliest "API management" was actually Writing and maintaining interface documents . Interfaces often exist in the form of "function documentation" or "HTTP call instructions":


  • Documents are usually manually maintained and lack standards;
  • Update lag, which is easy to be inconsistent with the actual interface;
  • There is no unified collaboration process, it depends entirely on developer agreements.


But this stage accumulates early user habits and demand models for subsequent standardization.


2. Standardization stage: interface design enters the standard track


Typical period : 2010~2016
represents specifications/tools : Swagger (OpenAPI), RAML, API Blueprint, Stoplight


With the popularity of REST API, interface management has gradually shifted from "post-document" to "pre-design":


  • Swagger/OpenAPI has gradually become the de facto standard;
  • Developers started using Structured specification definition API (such as JSON Schema);
  • Tools that support interface simulation (Mock) and automatic document generation have appeared;
  • API testing, acceptance, and joint debugging have become more efficient and standardized.


This enables " Specification-centric API lifecycle ".


3. Platformization stage: Establishment of API collaboration and governance system


Typical period : 2016~2020
Representative Tools : APIFox, Postman, SwaggerHub, YApi


In the context of microservice outbreak and front-end separation, API The number has surged, and manual management is unsustainable. Platformization becomes a trend:


  • Integration Design, Documentation, Mock, Testing, Collaboration integrate;
  • Supports interface version management, change review, and permission control;
  • Teams can manage interfaces like "manage code";
  • Interface becomes between teams Contract ;
  • Content both developer experience (DX) and interface asset management.


This type of platform often focuses on the R&D stage and does not necessarily cover the production environment or traffic governance, but greatly improves development efficiency and quality.


4. Lifecycle governance phase: Interface assets enter the DevOps process


Typical period : 2020~2023
Representative Platform : Backstage, Gravitee, Tyk Dashboard, Apigee


Key Features :


  • API is included in SDLC (Software Development Lifecycle) management;
  • Unified governance specifications: interface naming, classification, dependency, approval, and release;
  • Automation integration with CI/CD processes (such as API Linter verification, change compliance check);
  • Get Full life cycle perspective : Design → Development → Test → Release → Monitor → Iteration;
  • Introduced the concept of "API Catalog", which is similar to the interface repository of code repository;
  • Administrator visual master API Asset structure, dependency, quality indicators.


This stage marks the API to be governable Digital Assets , not engineering byproducts.


5. Commercialization and open platform stage: API as a service


Typical period : 2022 To date
Representative products : Apigee, AWS API Gateway Portal, Azure API Management, Alibaba Cloud Open Platform


Enterprises begin to use APIs as Products and Services To operate and commercialize:


  • Build a partner/developer Open Platform (Developer Portal) ;
  • Support registration, call, subscription, billing, quota, and monitoring;
  • API has product features such as "configurable SLA", "service level", "version control", and "life cycle notification";
  • Managers manage API interfaces like running SaaS products;
  • Aids in API reuse, service packaging and commercial monetization.


This stage marks the leap of the API from "internal tools" to "the carrier of the enterprise's open ecosystem."


Comparison of Key Differences

Cloud Native


Discussion API Gateways and APIs When managing the key differences, a common metaphor is: "API gateways are like doormen, while API management is like property." Although this is an image, to truly understand the essential differences between the two, you have to return to the problem area they are concerned about.


1. Different starting point: runtime vs life cycle


The starting point of the API gateway is runtime request control. It solves the problems of "how to forward, how to limit flow, whether it is safe, and whether it returns are compliant after a request comes in." These are traffic issues that are handled in real time, so gateway components must be high-performance, low-latency, close to the service call chain, and their responsibilities are similar to infrastructure.


The starting point of API management is the full life cycle governance of APIs. It focuses on more service-oriented issues such as "how to define interfaces, how to write documents, how to control versions, how to make third parties safe use, how to measure and bill, and how to remove the abandoned API". It is aimed at the management of APIs as a "asset", not a single call at runtime.


The difference in this starting point is the root of the difference between the two.


2. Different role perspectives: dual perspectives between architects and operators


API gateways are deployed and configured by platform teams or operation and maintenance and architects. For example, in cloud native scenarios, the gateway is responsible for taking over all incoming and outgoing traffic, accessing security authentication, service discovery, load balancing and other functions.


And API management serves more API designers, product managers, and even Developer Relations (DevRel) teams. It provides tools such as documents, Mock, change notification, release process, usage indicators, etc., and is the core platform for building a developer ecosystem and interface asset catalog.


It can be said that the gateway is more like the "infrastructure", while API management is more like the "application middle platform" or the "service operation tool". Typical API open platforms include Gaode, WeChat official account, Alibaba Cloud open platform, large language model and other developer platforms.


3. Different technical kernels: Traffic proxy vs metadata control


From the technical implementation, the core of the API gateway is a high-performance proxy service (such as Envoy, Higress), which directly participates in network paths, intercepts and processes every request.


The core of the API management platform is a metadata-driven API orchestration system, which manages interface definitions (such as OpenAPI), permissions, versions, subscriptions, documents and other information, and can integrate peripheral capabilities such as CI/CD and SDK generation, API Portal.


Therefore, the implementation ideas, deployment modes, performance requirements, and observation dimensions of the two are significantly different.


4. Practical combination scenario: API is an interface, but also an asset


In the digital transformation of traditional enterprises, we often say "API as a service", which is to look at API from the perspective of business output. To treat an API as an external service, we must not only control who can access it (gateway responsibility), but also manage its life cycle, stability, version iteration and developer experience (management responsibility).


Therefore, large enterprises or platforms usually deploy these two types of capabilities at the same time: control the underlying request traffic with the gateway, and assist the "output, operation and commercialization" API with the API management platform.


Summary: Comparison of key differences in API gateways vs. API management


Core focus

Train layer governance : Request forwarding, security control, protocol conversion, flow control, etc.

Interface lifecycle governance : From design, documentation, testing to release, operation, commercialization

Typical role

Operation and maintenance, platform architect, SRE, security engineer

Product Manager, API Designer, Developer Relations (DevRel), Operations

Life cycle phase

More preferred Runtime(runtime) : The request to enter the gateway will be processed

More override Full life cycle : Design, Test, Deploy, Release, Monitoring

Opening ability to third parties

Limited, only access channels are provided

Strong, supports developers to register, subscribe, call, monitor, pay, etc.

Representative Tools

Higress, Envoy, Kong, Alibaba Cloud API Gateway

Apigee, APIFox, Postman, Alibaba Cloud API Open Platform

Dimensions

API Gateway

API Management (API Management)

Follow object

Runtime traffic : Handle request scheduling for "who will access whom"

Interface resource itself : Definition, version, permissions, assets, consumption methods

Typical abilities

-Routing
- Protocol Conversion
- Authentication
- Current limit fuse
- Traffic Grayscale
- Security protection

- API specification design
- Document generation and synchronization
- Test case management
- Mock Service
- Permissions and Collaboration
- Developer Portal and Billing

Border control granularity

Coarse granularity: mainly routes, paths, and hosts, manage "access channels"

Fine granularity: management and change control at the interface level and field level

Interface change governance

Usually do not care about interfaces schema Change, only control whether the traffic is reachable

Follow interface version changes, compatibility damage, change notifications, etc.

Developer collaboration support

Weak, as access portal only

Strong, provide Mock, testing, collaboration, approval, change management and other functions


Work together




Cloud Native

In real systems, API gateway and API management have never been a problem of "choose one of two", but a combination of "two swords combined". One is responsible for the runtime scheduling and protection of traffic, and the other is responsible for the production, release and operation of APIs. Only by collaborating the two can we build an API infrastructure that is both efficient and sustainable.


1. Collaborative roles in hierarchical architecture


In a platform architecture, the life cycle of an API can be abstracted into three levels of responsibilities:


  • Production layer (API design and implementation): Developers use OpenAPI/GraphQL and other specifications to define APIs.
  • Publishing Layer (API Management Platform) : Manage the version, permissions, documents, subscriptions, audits, etc. of the API.
  • Running layer (API gateway): Responsible for requested access control, protocol conversion, routing forwarding, secure interception, etc.

For example:

  • The developer released a new interface in the API management platform. /v2/user/info , and set that the user must bind the API Key.
  • The platform will send meta information such as interface definitions and authentication rules to the API gateway.
  • The gateway intercepts requests, verifies identity, and forwards them to the backend service based on this.
  • The call log, failure rate and other data are uploaded back to the management platform as the basis for monitoring and operation analysis.


This forms a closed loop from design → publish → call → reflow feedback.


2. Collaboration method: Policy linkage and interface synchronization


Specifically, the coordination between the two is mainly reflected in the following aspects:


Flow control

Manage call quota, Token quota, subscription rules

Real-time execution of current limiting, fuse, and Token verification

Observation Feedback

Summary call logs, error rate, user behavior

Collect and upload runtime metrics and logs

Coordinate point

API Management Platform Responsibilities

API gateway responsibilities

Interface Definition

Provides standard interface specification management such as OpenAPI

Receive specifications, generate routing configuration

Security policy

Configure authentication, current limit, access permissions

Enforced at runtime

Publishing process

Audit release, version switching, grayscale release

Support dynamic routing and traffic weight control


3. Tool combination: How to match open source and business ecology


This collaboration has been very mature in modern API toolchains, whether it is open source or commercial solutions:


  • Open source combination: Higress + Apifox
  • Business platform: API Gateway + API Management Tool Enterprise Edition, where Alibaba Cloud API Gateway and Google Apigee provide unified control plane and data plane, API management and gateway integration.


These solutions collectively reflect a trend: the more mature the platform is, the more they focus on the integration and automation of API management and gateways.


Future development trends:

AI gateway and MCP Server Management Evolution

Cloud Native


As applications move towards the large language model paradigm, the role of APIs is undergoing fundamental changes. From "accessing an interface for a backend service" to "calling MCP Server through a large language model". This shift brings new challenges, pushing API gateways and API management into a new stage, namely AI gateways and MCP Server management.


AI gateway: jump from container and microservice inlet to model and MCP inlet


Under the container and microservice architecture, the API gateway is responsible for access control, service discovery, protocol conversion and security policies. However, in the era of large language model, the connotation of "traffic" and "service" has been redefined, and the API gateway has also completed the transition from microservice entrance to model entrance.


Why do you need an AI gateway?


In large-scale applications, traffic is no longer short, flat and fast HTTP requests, but long connections, semantics, high-cost, and complex state inference requests. This type of request has the following new features:


  • Call path dynamically changes : Different scenarios need to be routed to different large models or model versions.
  • Resource consumption is unbalanced : The same request may consume thousands to tens of thousands of tokens and requires dynamic quota management.
  • Request context strong dependency : Prompt, historical messages, and system settings will greatly affect the model output.
  • Sensitized to grayscale control : The new model needs to support grouping grayscale, fallback strategy and metric monitoring by user when it is launched.
  • Safety and compliance pressure : Calling content and returning content may involve data security, copyright, and ethical issues.


These characteristics far exceed the responsibilities of traditional API gateways, and have also promoted the birth of the AI ​​gateway form.


New capability structure of AI gateway


AI gateway can be regarded as the "infrastructure of large model interfaces". On the basis of retaining the core responsibilities of traditional gateways, the following two layers of capabilities have been expanded:


  • Looking at the large language model: A variety of new capabilities have been added in model availability, security protection, model illusion reduction, and observability. For details, please visit: 10 basic capabilities that AI gateways require ,
    In actual engineering, these capabilities are usually built on cloud-native gateways such as Higress, and extend the gateway capabilities of AI scenarios through plug-ins.
  • Estimated for MCP:
  • API-to-MCP: Provides REST API to directly convert it into MCP Server, avoiding repetitive labor such as rebuilding and maintaining MCP Server.
  • Protocol uninstall: Seamlessly supports the latest version of the MCP protocol, reducing upgrade costs, such as supporting converting SSE to Streamable HTTP, avoiding stateless applications also using SSE.
  • MCP market: Provides an official maintenance MCP market to ensure that the MCP server is usable, easy to use and safe.


It can be said that the birth of AI gateway marks a change in the semantics of "traffic": it is no longer just a carrier for requesting bytes, but it carries the complex capabilities of semantic understanding, token distribution, cost scheduling and intelligent decision-making, becoming the basic entrance for enterprises to build intelligent applications.


MCP Server: In the era of large language model, management tools are also needed


In traditional applications, the API is a deterministic input and output interface for consumers to call; while in large language model applications, the caller becomes a large language model and the called party becomes an MCP Server. Therefore, the traditional API management platform (based on the Swagger specification Design → Development → Test → Release → Monitoring → Iteration ) can no longer meet the MCP specification.


Just as the early REST API explosion gave birth to API management tools such as Postman and Apifox, the prosperity of MCP will also give birth to MCP Server (AI native API) management, a new demand.


Reference API management, it may require the following capabilities:


  • Production layer (MCP design and implementation): Developers use MCP and other specifications to develop, define and debug MCP for external agent calls.
  • Publishing layer (MCP management platform): manages MCP versions, permissions, documents, subscriptions, audits, etc.
  • Product Layer (MCP Marketplace): Monetize MCP Server through a unified authentication system, and build an open market ecosystem with MCP products as the core.


Recalling the development of the entire interface technology, we can see a clear "dual-track evolution" trajectory: the API gateway is responsible for the full lifecycle management of traffic, while the API management is aimed at the full lifecycle management of API, and the two naturally cooperate.


In the microservice era, one is responsible for guarding the entrance, the other is responsible for orchestrating the exit; in the era of large language model, they are gradually jointly supporting the new paradigm of model service, call platformization, and governance automation. In the future, APIs are not only connections, but also carriers of intelligent applications; API gateways and API management have jointly built the cornerstone of the ability of modern enterprises to open up internally and externally.