A brief discussion on how to use [prompt engineering] to empower your business scenarios

#  Context  #A transnational money laundering case involving multiple suspects and multiple overseas accounts. The case involves the interests of multiple parties and is difficult to investigate. It has now entered the judicial trial stage.
# Target  #* Clarify the key facts and legal disputes of the case.* Make investigative and judicial recommendations based on evidence.
#Styling  #Use professional, rigorous and legally logical language. The report should be clear and the legal provisions should be quoted accurately and appropriately.
# Tone  #Be fair and objective, and maintain rationality and logical analysis.
# Audience  #The public prosecution department of the procuratorate, the judges of the court, and the legal team related to the case.
# Response The analysis report must include the case background, the persons involved, the main points of dispute, analysis of key evidence, opinions on the application of law, and conclusions and suggestions. If you need to list the main points, you can use a list format, with a ⚖️ (scale) Emoji before each point to distinguish them.

# RoleDescription: You are expected to play the role of a senior assistant prosecutor.Features: Familiar with criminal law and criminal procedure law, and able to conduct in-depth analysis of complex cross-regional crimes.
# ActionTask: Provide suggestions for strengthening the weak links in the chain of evidence in this case and make preliminary suggestions on the sentencing of the suspect.
# script1.  Investigate the legitimacy and integrity of existing sources of evidence.2.  Analyze the connections between suspects and their principal-accessory relationships.3.  Determine the applicable legal provisions and sentencing range.4.  Propose areas that require further investigation or reinforcement.
# contentCase background: A case involving suspected financial fraud involving a huge amount of money, multiple defendants committing crimes across provinces, and many victims.Legal basis: relevant provisions of the Criminal Law on fraud, joint crime and multiple punishments for multiple crimes, and the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law on evidence collection standards.
# ExampleA brief analysis can be provided. For example: Can the existing evidence prove that there is a clear joint criminal intent between the defendants? Is it necessary to further supplement it from bank statements, communication records, etc.?
# FormatReport format: Divided into chapters, it includes five parts: "Case Overview", "Evidence Analysis", "Application of Law", "Investigation Recommendations" and "Conclusion".

# Capacity and RoleDescription: You are expected to play the role of an experienced criminal trial judge's assistant.Features: Possess trial experience, and be able to comprehensively consider case facts and flexibly apply the law.
# InsightCase information: This is a case of embezzlement. The defendant used his position to embezzle company funds, and the amount involved was large.Background: The company’s finances have been preliminarily audited and the chain of evidence is relatively complete, but further investigation is still needed to determine whether the suspect is involved in other economic crimes.
# StatementDescription: Please analyze the characterization and sentencing of this case, and assess whether there are any special circumstances that may aggravate or mitigate the sentence.Importance: This case may trigger internal shareholder conflicts within the company and have a significant impact on society, so it needs to be handled with caution.
# PersonalityStyle: Professional, rigorous, well-reasoned, and with appropriate citations of legal provisions and judicial interpretations.Example: The crime of embezzlement can be analyzed from three aspects: the constituent elements of the crime, the integrity of the chain of evidence, and the aggravating or mitigating circumstances.
# ExperimentDescription: If possible, please make arguments from the perspective of "the prosecution's accusation" and "the defense lawyer's defense" respectively to demonstrate the analytical thinking of different standpoints.Purpose: To help further examine the robustness of case evidence and the accuracy of legal application.

# Capacity and RoleDescription: You are expected to play the role of an experienced criminal trial judge's assistant.Features: Possess trial experience, and be able to comprehensively consider case facts and flexibly apply the law.
# InsightCase information: This is a case of embezzlement. The defendant used his position to embezzle company funds, and the amount involved was large.Background: The company’s finances have been preliminarily audited and the chain of evidence is relatively complete, but further investigation is still needed to determine whether the suspect is involved in other economic crimes.
# StatementDescription: Please analyze the characterization and sentencing of this case, and assess whether there are any special circumstances that may aggravate or mitigate the sentence.Importance: This case may trigger internal shareholder conflicts within the company and have a significant impact on society, so it needs to be handled with caution.
# PersonalityStyle: Professional, rigorous, well-reasoned, and with appropriate citations of legal provisions and judicial interpretations.Example: The crime of embezzlement can be analyzed from three aspects: the constituent elements of the crime, the integrity of the chain of evidence, and the aggravating or mitigating circumstances.
# ExperimentDescription: If possible, please make arguments from the perspective of "the prosecution's accusation" and "the defense lawyer's defense" respectively to demonstrate the analytical thinking of different standpoints.Purpose: To help further examine the robustness of case evidence and the accuracy of legal application.

# InstructionDescription: Please organize the key information from the following investigation transcript into a brief summary of the case facts.Importance: Accurate extraction of case facts has a significant impact on subsequent legal characterization and judgment.
# ContextScenario: The investigation record is from a cross-provincial smuggling case involving multiple persons from different regions.Purpose: The case outline needs to be submitted to the procuratorate, and the content should be concise and clear.
# Input Data"During the interrogation, the suspect Wang confessed his method of smuggling high-end electronic products into the country by hiding them in containers at the port... (Some contents of the transcript are omitted here)."
# Output IndicatorStyle: Formal, accurate, and in line with judicial writing standards.Note: You must ensure that the facts are described objectively without any subjective speculation.

Context:This case involves a criminal case of environmental pollution. The factory illegally discharged harmful wastewater, causing serious pollution to local water sources.
Objective:It is necessary to determine the extent of the responsibility of the factory involved and whether the statutory elements of the crime of environmental pollution are met through research and judgment.
Actions:1. Analyze the factory’s wastewater discharge records and test reports.2. Check the data from the local environmental monitoring department with the company’s self-inspection data.3. Investigate whether there is deliberate discharge and regulatory circumvention.
Scenario:The factory is located in the suburbs of the city, not far from the residential area. There have been many cases of physical discomfort caused by drinking water pollution. After repeated warnings from the local environmental protection department were ineffective, the police were called.
Task:You are required to prepare a professional case analysis report, which is divided into four parts: "Case Summary", "Verification of Illegal Facts", "Comparison with Laws and Regulations", and "Investigation Conclusion", and put forward suggestions for the handling of the persons involved in the case.

Task:Analyzing a suspected case of occupational corruption requires a comprehensive assessment of the flow of funds involved, the suspect’s personal accounts, and the company’s financial data.
Request:Please provide a detailed research and judgment report, including the case background, introduction of the persons involved, key evidence and witness testimony, applicable law and sentencing recommendations. The report should be presented in a point-by-point format.
Action:1. Retrieve and review the suspect’s bank statements and company accounts.2. Check the discrepancies between the company’s financial data and the suspect’s personal spending records.3. Cite relevant legal provisions and conduct analysis based on cases.
Context:The suspect served as the company's financial director. At the time of the incident, large abnormal expenditures appeared in the company's accounts. The internal audit results showed that the suspect may have used his position to embezzle company funds.
Example:The writing method of the "key evidence" section can be listed as an example, such as:  - By comparing bank statements, it was found that the suspect purchased a large number of luxury goods at a later stage of the company's abnormal expenditure.  - Witness testimony showed that the suspect had approved multiple funds on his own during internal meetings.  
Present the report structure in this way to ensure that each section is clearly visible and logically coherent.

Role:Please play the role of a senior anti-money laundering investigator, responsible for analyzing a cross-border money laundering case.
Objective:It is necessary to clarify the suspect's capital flow, potential partners and key links in the money laundering chain to provide reference opinions for subsequent judicial proceedings.
Scenario:The funds involved in this case are complex, and it is suspected that the illegal proceeds were transferred through multiple layers of bank accounts and offshore companies. The investigation department has initially obtained some evidence, but still needs to analyze the flow of funds and the background of the people involved from a professional perspective.
Expected Solution:I hope to get a systematic research report, including:1. A relationship diagram of the main persons involved, accounts and company structures.  2. Analysis of the legitimacy and suspicious aspects of each transfer node.  3. Suggestions for further investigation and strengthening of the investigation.  
Steps:You must explain step by step how you compared the account flow, how you identified suspicious transactions, identified possible offshore company "shell" operations, and explained the laws and regulations you relied on (such as the Anti-Money Laundering Law and relevant provisions of the Criminal Law). Please make sure that your conclusions are well-founded and clearly organized.

Role:I need you to play the role of a professional telecommunications fraud case analyst and provide investigative advice to the public security authorities.
Input:Case background: Victims in multiple provinces and cities reported cases, all of whom were defrauded by the same rhetoric of "customer service refund", and the phone numbers and bank accounts involved in the case were circulated across provinces. The police have obtained some call recordings and bank flow information.
Steps:1.  Check the "phishing tactics" commonly used by fraudsters based on the timestamp of the call recording;2.  Compare bank statements, analyze the rules of fund transfers, and identify possible accomplices or account splitting mechanisms;3.  Combine existing cross-regional information to initially identify fraud dens or upstream organizations;4.  Explain the technical or legal means (such as communication big data screening, provisions on fraud in the Criminal Law) used to make the analysis and judgment.
Expectation:I need a complete case study report, including:-Summary of  fraud methods and speech patterns  -  Funds flow chart and suspicious account list  -Feasibility  suggestions for further investigation and arrest  Please ensure that the report content is logically clear, has sufficient evidence, and can be directly used by public security organs.

Role:You are a legal consultant engaged in environmental law research, responsible for conducting legal analysis on a criminal case involving suspected environmental pollution.
Action:1.  Evaluate whether the pollutants discharged by the enterprise exceed the legal standards;2.  Check the discrepancy between the test data of the environmental protection department and the self-test data of the enterprise;3.  Analyze whether the enterprise is suspected of deliberately evading supervision during the production process;4.  Start from the legislative provisions of the Criminal Law on environmental pollution crimes and make a qualitative assessment based on judicial interpretations.
Context:The company is located upstream of the river, and residents nearby have frequently sought medical treatment due to deteriorating water quality, which has aroused widespread social concern. The environmental protection department has issued multiple warnings, but the company has not made adequate rectifications, and the local police eventually opened a case for investigation.
Expectation:I hope you can give a professional and feasible legal opinion, including:-Key  controversial points and evidence list of the case  -Analysis  of applicable laws and possible scope of criminal liability  -  Recommendations on penalties for companies and relevant responsible persons  -Focus  areas for follow-up investigation and monitoring  Please ensure that your opinions are clear and can be directly adopted by the procuratorate and the court.

Context:This case is a criminal case involving inter-provincial drug trafficking. The main suspect used logistics express delivery to distribute drugs to multiple locations. The police have seized some drugs and related express delivery documents.
Action:You need to sort out the logistics and express information, financial transactions, and communication records between suspects in the case to determine their organizational form and hierarchy. You also need to evaluate whether the existing evidence can point to the main culprit and whether further investigation of accomplices is needed.
Result:I hope to get a detailed case assessment report, including:1. Identity information and division of labor of the main criminal suspects  2. The main flow chart of capital transactions and drug logistics  3. Legal qualitative advice: whether it is suspected of joint crime of drug trafficking, and reference for sentencing range  4. The key direction and evidence collection focus for the next step of investigation  
Example:For example, you can first list the suspect's name (or code name), the frequency of call records, and the timetable for the shipment and receipt of goods in the report, and then use a concise list to point out the facts pointed to by each piece of evidence. Finally, in the "legal characterization" section, briefly quote the corresponding provisions of the criminal law and judicial interpretations, and put forward your views on the aggravating or mitigating circumstances.

Task:Investigate a case of corporate financial fraud involving inflated sales and falsified financial statements.
Action:1.  Check the company's financial statements and audit records over the years to find out abnormal data;2.  Compare bank statements with actual goods circulation to identify the specific methods of inflating revenue;3.  Analyze the specific responsibilities of the company's management or financial managers and internal collusion;4.  Characterize according to the relevant provisions of the Criminal Law on financial fraud or false financial information.
Goal:A complete assessment report that can be submitted to the judicial authorities is required, including:-Key  evidence of false financial data  -Possible  crimes and corresponding criminal responsibilities  -  Specific legal opinions for each relevant responsible person  -  Suggestions for additional investigation or evidence collection  The report must be logically rigorous, with evidence and opinions corresponding to each other, so as to be convenient for use by the procuratorate and the court.

Action:Please prepare a one-month investigation plan for me to investigate a cross-border money laundering case. The plan must clearly define the daily or weekly investigation focus, including arrangements for key links such as bank statements, offshore accounts, and interrogations of relevant personnel, to ensure that the investigation progress is consistent and there is no duplication of evidence.
Purpose:I hope that through this investigation plan, we can systematically deploy various investigative measures to avoid missing key evidence or wasting investigative resources. This plan is designed to help the investigation team improve efficiency, comply with legal procedures, and form a complete chain of evidence as soon as possible.
Expectation:I expect to receive a detailed and executable investigation plan, including:1.  List of reconnaissance tasks for each stage;  2.  Required departmental collaboration (such as financial regulatory agencies, international judicial assistance, etc.);  3.  Possible legal and procedural obstacles and contingency plans;  4.  Suggestions on the investigation time and priority of each link.  Please ensure that the planning ideas are clear, the logic is sound, and that it can fully meet the special requirements of cross-border investigations.

Expectation:I want to clarify whether the current evidence is sufficient to establish a case, prosecute or convict in this criminal case of suspected financial fraud, and I also want to identify whether there are any potential accomplices or other charges.
Role:You are a senior financial crime prosecutor, familiar with company financial data review, bank flow investigation, and the relevant provisions and judicial interpretations of the Criminal Law regarding financial and economic crimes.
Action:Based on the existing materials (including inflated sales contracts, bank statements, internal audit reports, etc.), please write a case study opinion letter, including:1.  The main suspects in the case and their positions or roles in the company;  2.  The methods, scale and possible motivations of inflating financial data;  3.  The degree of matching between the existing evidence and the legal provisions, and whether there are any areas where the evidence is insufficient;  4.  Suggest the direction of the next step of additional investigation (such as additional audit, questioning key witnesses or obtaining more bank statements);  5.  Reference for possible crimes and sentencing ranges.
Please ensure that the report is clearly organized and well-argued so that it can be used directly by the prosecution or trial authorities.